Initially, I was impressed. For all of the acclaim this received for being a book about a home that was destroyed in Hurricane Katrina, Broom makes curiously little mention of it in the first two sections. I expected a frame story that began with Katrina and moved backwards to the construction of the house and then forwards to the fate of the house post-Katrina. Broom moves chronologically, starting before she is even alive which may account for the some of the detached quality of the first two sections, especially the first. Maybe it’s Broom’s journalism background.
I was also concerned that for too long, the camera stays too close to the details. There’s a little context in terms of the relationship between New Orleans East and New Orleans, but mostly we are looking at the details that emerge as Broom’s family and the house evolve.
There’s also little by way of commentary until the post-Katrina sections. There is plenty that could be brought forward from the story – urban geography, the American Dream, race, Broom’s own uneasy sense of belonging – but she chooses not to highlight any particular strand. I didn’t need to be told what things mean, but I wondered about the point of it all. After all, hers was far from the only home destroyed by the Hurricane. Why did she tell her story?
There’s more reflection in the post-Katrina sections as the family seeks compensation for the lost house and all that it did represent and that it came to represent (for some of them) post-Katrina. In the end, what I walked away with was the meaning of the home to Broom, who felt guilty about not staying in New Orleans and to some of her family members. There’s a poignant comment about home ownership at the end that I would choose as my anchor if I were to re-read this.
I just think the book needed a clearer line through. Because it isn’t just about the house. There are times when it’s barely a minor character. But with a topic like the meaning (including the inherent challenges) of home ownership for Broom’s family at that time, in that place, before, during, and after that experience, I think the narrative would have hung together more effectively.